1 D. A. Bender and P. K. Snyder. DC power management with a high performance flywheel. In Electrical Energy Storage Systems Applications and Technologies (EESAT) Conference Proceedings, 2002. See also www.afstrinity.com. 2 Ibid. 3 R. Hockney and C. Driscoll. Powering of standby power supplies using flywheel energy storage. In International-Telecommunications-Energy-Conference (INTELEC), pages 105– 109. See also www.beaconpower.com, 1997. 4 R. Wagner and R. Jansen. Flywheel technology development at the NASA Glenn Research Center. In Electrical Energy Storage Systems Applications and Technologies (EESAT) Conference Proceedings, 2002. 5 D. Townley. Introducing pentadyne power flywheel energy storage system. In Electrical Energy Storage Systems Applications and Technologies (EESAT) Conference Proceedings, 2002. See also www.pentadyne.com. 6 H. Hofmann and S. R. Sanders. High-speed synchronous reluctance machine with minimized rotor losses. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 36:531–539, 2000. 7 M. Hippner and R. G. Harley. High speed synchronous homopolar and permanent magnet machines comparative study. In Conference Record of the IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, pages 74–78, 1992. 8 P. Tsao, M. Senesky, and S. R. Sanders. A synchronous homopolar machine for high-speed applications. In Conference Record of the IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, pages 406–416, 2002. 9 M. K. Senesky, Control of a synchronous homopolar machine for flywheel applications. M. S. thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2003. 10 G. P. Rao, Jr., J. L. Kirtley, D. C. Meeker, and K. J. Donegan. Hybrid permanent magnet/homopolar generator and motor. U.S. Patent 6,097,124, Aug. 2000. 11 O. Ichikawa, A. Chiba, and T. Fukao. Development of homopolar type bearingless motors. In Conference Record of the IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, pages 1223–1228, 1999. 12 Jin He and Feng Lin. A high frequency high power IGBT inverter drive for a 45hp/16,000 rpm brushless homopolar inductor motor. In Conference Record of the IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, pages 9–15, 1995. 13 M. Siegl and V. Kotrba. Losses and cooling of a high-speed and high-output power homopolar inductor alternator. In “IEE International Conference on Electrical Machines and Drives,” pages 295–299, Sept. 1991. 14 M. S. Sarma. Electric Machines: Steady-State Theory and Dynamic Performance. New York: West Publishing Company, 1994. 15 Jin He and Feng Lin. A high frequency high power IGBT inverter drive for a 45hp/16,000 rpm brushless homopolar inductor motor. In Conference Record of the IEEE IAS Annual Meeting, pages 9–15, 1995. 16 M. S. Sarma. 17 O. Ichikawa, A. Chiba, and T. Fukao. 18 M. Hippner and R. G. Harley. 19 S. Richey. Cleansource2 battery-free energy storage: theory of operation. In Electrical Energy Storage Systems Applications and Technologies (EESAT) Conference Proceedings, 2002. See also www.activepower.com. 20 G.P. Rao, Jr., J. L. Kirtley, D.C. Meeker, and K. J. Donegan. Hybrid permanent magnet/homopolar generator and motor. U.S. Patent 6,097,124, Aug. 2000. 21 Jin He and Feng Lin. 22 M. Hippner and R. G. Harley. 23 S. Richey. Cleansource2 battery-free energy storage: theory of operation. In Electrical Energy Storage Systems Applications and Technologies (EESAT) Conference Proceedings, 2002. See also www.activepower.com. 24 O. Ichikawa, A. Chiba, and T. Fukao. 25 G. P. Rao, Jr., J. L. Kirtley, D. C. Meeker, and K. J. Donegan. 26 M. S. Sarma. 27 H. Hofmann and S. R. Sanders. 28 J. W. Smith. Tolerance rings. Industry Applications Magazine, 8(5):74–82, Sept-Oct 2002. 29 R. F. Nelson. “Power requirements for batteries in hybrid electric vehicles.” Journal of Power Sources, 91:2–26, 2000. 30 H. Hofmann. High-Speed Synchronous Reluctance Machine for Flywheel Applications. PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 1998. 31 Heezen, B. C., Ewing, M., and Miller, E. T., Deep Sea Res., 1, 25 (1953). 32 Keen, M. J., Nature, 197, 888 (1963). 33 Adams, R. D., Christoffel, D. A. J. of Geophys. Res., 67, 805 (1962). 34 Heirtzler, J. R. Tech Rep. No. 2, Lamont Geol. Obs., New York (1961). 35 Matthews, D. H., et al., Admiralty Marine Sci. Pub. No. 4 (in the press). 36 Heezen, B. C., Ewing, M., and Miller, E. T. 37 Bullard, E. C. and Mason, R. G. The Sea, 3, edit. by Hill, M. N. (in the press). 38 Dietz, R. S., Nature, 190, 854 (1961). 39 Cox, A., Doell, R. R., and Dalrymple, G. B. Nature, 198, 1049 (1963). 40 Ibid. 41 Mason, R. G., Geopyhs. J., 1, 320 (1958). 42 Mason, R. G., and Raph, A. D. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 72, 1259 (1961). 43 Hospers, J., Geol. Mag., 91, 352 (1954). 44 Thorarinsson, S., Einarsson, T., and Kjartansson, G., Intern. Geog. Cong. (Norden), Excursion E.I.1 (1960). 45 Cox, A., Doell, R. R. J. of Geophys. Res., 67, 3997 (1962). 46 Raff, A. D. J. of Geophys. Res., 68, 955 (1963). 47 Cox, A., and Doell, R. R. 48 Raff, A. D. 49 Bullard, E. C., and Mason, R. G. 50 Beusch, H., Fieguth, P., and Wicke E., 1972, Advances in chemistry series 109, 615. 51 Engel, T., and Ertl G., 1979, Adv. Catal. 28, 1. 52 Jakubith, S., Rotermund, H. H., Engel, W., von Oertzen, A., and Ertl, G.1990, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3013. 53 Heck, R.M. and R.J. Farrauto. 2001, Applied Catalysis A: General 221, 443. 54 Harmsen, J.M., Hoebink, J. H., and Schouten J. C. 2001, Chem. Eng. Sci. 56, 2019. 55 Clarke, B. L., 1980, Adv. Chem. Phys. 43, 1. 56 Kubičex, M. and Marex M. 1983, Computational methods in bifurcation theory and dissipative structures, Springer Verlag, New York. 57 Koči, P., Nevoral, V., Záhrubsky, M., Kubiček, M., and Marex, M. 2004, Chem. Eng. Sci. 59, 5597. 58 Koči, et al. 59 Marex, M., Schejbal, M., Koči, P., Nevoral, V., Kubiček, M., Hadač, O., and Schreiber, I. 2006, Chaos 16, 037107. 60 Ross, J., I. Schreiber and Vlad, M. O. 2006, Determination of Complex Reaction Mechanisms, Oxford University Press, New York. 61 Eiswirth, M., Freund, A., and Ross, J. 1991, Adv. Chem. Phys. 80, 127. 62 Clarke, B. L. 63 Fosse, G., Risnes, S., and Holmbakken, N. 1973. Prisms and tubules in multituberculate enamel. Calcified Tissue Research 11: 133–150. 64 Sloan, R.E. and Van Valen, L. 1965. Cretaceous mammals from Montana. Science 148: 220–227. Sloan and Van Valen (1965) divided advanced multituberculates (later Cimolodonta of McKenna 1975) into the suborders Taeniolabidoidea and Ptilodontoidea. Kielan−Jaworowska and Hurum (2001) gave superfamily rank to Taeniolabidoidea and Ptilodontoidea, and restricted Taeniolabidoidea to the single family Taeniolabididae (see also Fox 1999). The gigantoprismatic enamel recognized by Fosse, et al. (1978) as characteristic of Taeniolabidoidea sensu Sloan and Van Valen (1965) is now known to also occur in two genera of the paraphyletic suborder “Plagiaulacida,” the informally recognized Paracimexomys group, the superfamily Djadochtatherioidea, five families incertae sedis, and some incertae sedis genera. The “normal” enamel (sometimes called microprismatic) always seen in extant mammals occurs only in the superfamily Ptilodontoidea (see Kielan−Jaworowska and Hurum 2001 for details). As my paper is not systematic, but mainly technical, for simplicity I use the terms “suborder Taeniolabidoidea” and “suborder Ptilodontoidea” sensu Sloan and Van Valen (1965). 65 Fosse, G., Eskildsen, R., Risnes, S., and Sloan, E. 1978. Prism size in tooth enamel of some Late Cretaceous mammals and its value in multituberculate taxonomy. Zoologica Scripta 7: 57–61. 66 Carlson, S.J. and Krause, D.W. 1985. Enamel ultrastructure of multi− tuberculate mammals: an investigation of variability. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan 27: 1–50. 67 Krause, W.D. and Carlson, S.J. 1987. Prismatic enamel in multituberculate mammals: tests of homology and polarity. Journal of Mammalogy 68: 755–765. 68 Fosse, G., Kielan−Jaworowska Z., and Skaale, S. G. 1985. The microstructure of tooth enamel in multituberculate mammals. Palaeontology 28: 435–449. 69 Fosse, G. 1968a. The calculation of prism diameters and number of prisms per unit area in dental enamel. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 26: 315–336. 70 Fosse, G. 1968b. The numbers of cross−sectioned ameloblasts and prisms perunitareaintoothgerms. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 26: 573–603. 71 Von Koenigswald, W., and Sander, P.M. (eds.) 1997. Tooth Enamel Microstructure.180 pp. Balkema Press, Rotterdam. 72 Ibid. 73 Ibid. 74 Ibid. 75 Ibid. 76 Von Koenigswald, W., and Sander, P.M. (eds.) 1997. Tooth Enamel Microstructure.180 pp. Balkema Press, Rotterdam. 77. Ibid. 78. Ibid. 79. Ibid. 80. Ibid. 81. Fosse, G., Râdulescu, C., and Samson, P. M. 2001. Enamel microstructure of the Late Cretaceous multituberculate mammal Kogaionon. Acta Pala− eontologica Polonica 46: 437–440. 82. Ibid. 83. Ibid. 84. Ibid. 85. Kielan−Jaworowska, Z. and Hurum, J. 2001. Phylogeny and systematics of multituberculate mammals. Palaeontology 44: 389–429. 86. Ibid. 87. Ibid. 88. Krause, W. D. and Carlson, S. J. 1986. The enamel ultrastructure of multituberculate mammals: a review. Scanning Electron Microscopy, for 1986: 1591–1607. 89. Ibid. 90. Ibid. 91. Fosse, G., Kielan−Jaworowska, Z., and Ensom, P.C. 1991. Enamel ultrastructure of Late Jurassic multituberculate mammals. In: Kielan− Jaworowska, Z., Heintz, N. and Nakrem, H. A. (eds.). Fifth Symposium on Mesozoic Terrestrial Ecosystems and Biota. Extended Abstracts. Contribution from the Paleontological Museum, University of Oslo 364: 25–26. 92. Fosse, G. 1968c. Serial etching of dental enamel. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 26: 285–297. 93. Ibid. 94. Ibid. 95. Ibid. 96. Ibid. 97. The constants used in the numerator of Equations (6) and (7) place the specified signal-to-noise ratio at a middle grey image tone or approximately an 18 % reflectance value for a standard 160:1 contrast ratio scene. 98. If there is not a significant effect on the resulting S/N, a smaller or larger area is allowable. 99. ISO 6, Photography — Black-and-white pictorial still camera negative film/process systems — Determination of ISO speed. 100. ISO 2240, Photography — Colour reversal camera films — Determination of ISO speed. 101. ISO 2720, Photography — General purpose photographic exposure meters (photoelectric type) — Guide to product specification. 102. ISO, 2721, Photography — Cameras — Automatic controls of exposure. 103. ISO, 5763, Photography — Electronic flash equipment — Automatic control of exposure. 104. ISO, 5800, Photography — Colour negative films for still photography — Determination of ISO speed. 105. ISO 7187, Photography — Materials for direct-positive colour-print cameras — Determination of ISO speed. 106. ISO, 10157, Photography — Flash exposure meter — Requirements. 107. IEC, 61146-1, Video cameras (PAL/SECAM/NTSC) — Methods of measurement — Part 1: Non-broadcast single-sensor cameras. 108. Holm, J. Exposure-speed relations and tone reproduction. IS&T’s 47th Annual Conference/ICPS,Vol. II, 1994, pp. 641-648. 109. Holm, J. and Susstrunk, S. An EIQ-subjective image quality correlation study, IS&T’s 47th Annual Conference/ICPS, vol. II, 1994, pp. 634-640. 110. Holm, J. The photographic sensitivity of electronic still cameras. J. of the Society of Photographic Science and Technology of Japan, pp. 117-131, No. 1, 1996. 111. Jones, L. A. The evaluation of negative film speeds in terms of print quality. J. of the Franklin Institute, 227 (3), Mar. 1939, pp. 297-354. 112. Jones, L. A. and Condit, H. R. The brightness scale of exterior scenes and the computation of correct photographic exposure. J. of the Optical Society of America, 31 (11), Nov. 1941, pp. 651-678. 113. Juenger, A. K. and Higgins, E. W. A graininess metric for electronic still photography. IS&T’s 46th Annual Conference, 1993, pp. 408-410. 114. Kelly, S.C. and Keelan, B.W. ISO 12232 revision: determination of chrominance noise weights for noise-based ISO calculation, Proc. SPIE, 5668, 2005, pp. 139-147. 115. Scudder, J. F., Nelson, C. N., and Stimson, A. Re-evaluation of factors affecting manual or automatic control of camera exposure. J. SMPTE, 77, 1968, pp. 24-26. 116. Veith, G. On the automatic exposure of photographic camera films. Journal of Applied Photographic Engineering, 4 (2), Spring 1978, pp. 57-61. 117. Zwick, D. M. The technical basis of photographic speed determination, or what is a normal exposure. SMPTE Journal, 88 (8), Aug. 1979, pp. 533-537. 118. Provide the total dollar amount for the Net Construction Cost of “alterations” to the “primary function” area. {Please read below, and use the “Footnote (1*) Worksheet” below.} What is considered a “Primary function?” A “primary function” is a major activity for which the facility is intended or where the activities are germane (relevant, pertinent, relatable) to the establishment or program activity. Examples of areas that contain a “primary function” include, but are not limited to, the dining area of a cafeteria, those rooms or any area where educational sessions are held, kitchens or other preparation areas that may be used by the general public or within a private dormitory room, the meeting rooms in a conference center, as well as offices and other work areas in which the activities of the public entity using the facility are carried out (e.g., employee offices and employee work areas where non-employees or the general public must be able to approach, enter, and exit.) There can be multiple areas containing a “primary function” in a single building. Primary function areas are not limited to public use areas only. They can be any area where people carry out one or more of the major activities for which a facility is used. For instance, in housing at a place of education, the private use or exclusive use of any room for Fraternity/Sorority meetings, as well as the private sleeping rooms with their own bathrooms or kitchens are all considered primary function areas. What is considered an “alteration,” and what items are considered exempt “alterations?” The ADA uses the term “alteration” to mean any change to an existing building or facility that affects usability. As per DOJ and ADAAG written documents, “alterations” include, but are not limited to remodeling, renovating, rehabilitating, reconstructing, resurfacing of circulation paths or vehicular ways, historic restoration, changing or rearranging structural parts or elements, and changes or rearrangement in the plan configuration of walls and full-height partitions, or making other changes that affect or could affect the usability of the building or facility or portion thereof. (FYI: Definition of Facility. “All or any portion of buildings, structures, site improvements, elements, and pedestrian or vehicular ways located on a site.” Definition of Element. “An architectural or mechanical component of a building, facility, space, or site.”) Examples of “alterations” may include such as, but not limited to, the following: restriping a parking lot, adding walls, moving walls, moving a fixed ATM to another location, installing a new sales/reception counter or display shelves, changing a doorway entrance to a new location, replacing furniture/fixtures, flooring, or carpeting. Examples of exempt alterations: normal maintenance, such as reroofing, painting, or wallpapering, asbestos removal, or changes to mechanical and electrical systems may not be alterations, installation or alteration of fire protection systems unless they affect the usability of the building or facility. 119. Provide the dollar amount that is equal to 20% of the total dollar amount for “Net Construction cost of Alterations to the Primary Function areas.” {20% of #1 is the minimum $ amount required and should be spent on deficiencies at the path of travel.} The ADA does have limits for barrier removal. Disproportionate costs (“path of travel” improvements): removing or correcting barriers can be simple and inexpensive in one facility, but difficult and costly in another. For this reason, the ADA sets out a flexible rule for removing barriers. When the cost of improvements made to the path of travel exceeds 20% of the cost of the alteration to the primary function area, the ADA considers this ratio to be disproportionate, in which case the path of travel need only be made accessible to the extent necessary without having to incur the disproportionate cost. Anytime alterations (for an explanation of “alterations”, see footnote 1*) are made to a building or facility where ADA deficiencies at the path of travel still exist, up to 20 percent of the construction costs must be spent on barrier removal at the “path of travel.” For example, if the construction cost of alterations equals $100, then a maximum of $20 will need to be spent on barrier removal at the “path of travel.” 120. After providing an initial site visit, it is important to ask yourself, “What are the priorities for barrier removal along the path of travel to the primary function area, that will provide the greatest access?” Understanding how customers arrive at, enter, and move through your building to get to each primary function area and/or area of alteration will go a long way in identifying existing barriers and setting priorities for their removal. Do people arrive on foot, by car, or by public transportation? Does your particular building provide parking? How do customers enter and move about within your building? In any event, “priority should be given to those elements that will provide the greatest access.” In developing an implementation plan for readily achievable barrier removal, the Design Professional, NAU Project Manager, and any other NAU facilities stakeholders should consult with the appropriate NAU organizations representing persons with disabilities (such as NAU Office of Affirmative Action & Equal Opportunity, NAU Disability Resources, NAU Commission on Disability Access and Design) to solicit their suggestions. These organizations may provide useful guidance in identifying the most significant barriers to remove. 121. Costs that may be counted as expenditures required to provide an accessible path of travel may include accessible entrances. This includes the building entrance(s) and may also include how customers arrive at the building and facility. In any event, priority should be given to those elements that will provide the greatest access. 122. Costs that may be counted as expenditures required to provide an accessible path of travel may include an accessible route to the altered area. Costs associated with providing an accessible route to the altered area, for example, the cost of widening doorways or installing ramps, etc. 123. Costs that may be counted as expenditures required to provide an accessible path of travel may include costs associated with making restrooms accessible, such as installing grab bars, enlarging toilet stalls, insulating pipes, or installing accessible faucet controls. In any event, priority should be given to those elements that will provide the greatest access. 124. Costs that may be counted as expenditures required to provide an accessible path of travel may include costs associated with providing accessible telephones, such as relocating the telephone to an accessible height, installing amplification devices, or installing a text telephone (TTY). In any event, priority should be given to those elements that will provide the greatest access. 125. Costs that may be counted as expenditures required to provide an accessible path of travel may include costs associated with relocating an inaccessible drinking fountain. In any event, priority should be given to those elements that will provide the greatest access. 126. Costs that may be counted as expenditures required to provide an accessible path of travel may include additional accessible elements such as parking, storage, and alarms. 127. Add up all costs in #4 thru #9 , then write down this total dollar amount in #10. 128. Parcel No.: 136 a. An Easement to Humble Pipe Line Company recorded in Vol. 378, at Pg. 423, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. b. An Easement to Brazos River Electric Power Cooperative, recorded in Vol. 367 at Pg. 230, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. c. An Easement to Buena Vista Bethel Water Supply Corporation recorded in Vol. 760 at Pg. 854, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. d. The Company (Title Company) specifically excepts to underground utilities not shown and specifically excepted to on survey prepared by John F. Wilder, RPS No. #4285, dated June 21, 1990. e. Power lines, poles in place, and telephone riser denoted on the above described survey. 129. Parcel No.: 137 a. An Easement to Brazos River Electric Power Cooperative, recorded in Vol. 367 at Pg. 230, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. b. An Easement to Hill County Electric Cooperative, recorded in Vol. 733 at Pg. 666, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. c. Easements to Buena Vista Bethel Water Supply Corporation recorded in Vol. 580 at Pg. 680, and in Vol. 728 at Pg, 428, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. d. The Company (Title Company) specifically excepts to underground utilities not shown and specifically excepted to on survey prepared by Espey, Huston & Associates, Inc., dated June 11, 1990. e. Visible or apparent easements and all underground easements, the existence of which may arise by virtue of unrecorded grant or use. 130. Parcel No.: 138 a. Easement to Humble Pipe Line Company recorded in Vol. 378, at Pg. 423, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. b. Fifteen-foot easements to Buena Vista Bethel Water Supply Corporation recorded in Vol. 580 at Pg. 680, and in Vol. 728, at Pg. 428, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. c. Fifteen-foot easement to Hill County Electric Cooperative recorded in Vol. 733, at Pg. 666, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. d. Blanket easement to Brazos River Electric Transmission, recorded in Vol. 367 at Pg. 230, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. e. Ten-foot utility easement along front lot line per recorded plat and per survey prepared by Espey, Huston & Associates, Inc., dated May 21, 1990; seven and one half-foot utility easement running along near and both side lot lines per recorded plat and above noted survey; 30-foot building set back line across front of lot and 10% building set back line on side lot lines per plat, restrictions and above noted survey. f. Any portion of the subject property lying within the bounds of a public roadway. g. Visible or apparent easements and all underground easements, the existence of which may arise by virtue of an unrecorded grant or use. 131. Parcel No.: 139 a. Easement to Humble Pipe Line Company recorded in Vol. 378, at Pg. 423, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. b. Fifteen-foot easement to Buena Vista Bethel water Supply Corporation recorded in Vol. 580 at Pg. 680, and in Vol. 728, at Pg. 428. Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. c. Fifteen-foot easement to Hill County Electric Cooperative recorded in Vol. 733, at Pg. 666, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. d. Blanket easement to Brazos River Electric Transmission, recorded in Vol. 367 at Pg. 230, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. e. Ten-foot utility easement along front lot line per recorded plat and per survey prepared by Espey, Huston & Associates, Inc., dated May 21, 1990; seven and one half-foot utility easement running along rear and both side lot lines per recorded plat and above noted survey; 30-foot building set back line across front of lot and a 10% building set back line on side lot lines per plat, restrictions and above noted survey. f. Any portion of the subject property lying within the bounds of a public roadway. g. Visible or apparent easements and all underground easement, the existence of which may arise by virtue of an unrecorded grant or use. 132. Parcel No. 140 a. Fifteen-foot easement to Buena Vista Bethel Water Supply Corporation recorded in Vol. 580 at Pg. 680, and in Vol. 728, at Pg. 428, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. b. Fifteen-foot easement to Hill County Electric Cooperative recorded in Vol. 733, at Pg. 666, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. c. Blanket easement to Brazos River Electric Transmission, recorded in Vol. 367 at Pg. 230, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. d. Ten-foot utility easement along front lot line per recorded plat and per survey prepared by Espey, Huston & Associates, Inc., dated May 21, 1990, seven and one half-foot utility easement running along rear and both side lot lines per recorded plat and above noted survey; 30-foot building set back line across front of lot and restrictions and above noted survey. e. The Company (Title Company) specifically excepts to underground utilities and utility markers not shown and specifically excepted to from survey prepared by John F. Wilder, RPS No. #4285, Espey, Huston & Associates, Inc., dated May 21, 1990. 133. Parcel No. 141 a. Easements to Buena Vista Bethel water Supply Corporation recorded in Vol. 580 at Pg. 680, and in Vol. 728 at Pg. 428, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. b. Easements to Hill County Electric Coop. recorded in Vol. 733 at Pg. 666, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. c. Easement to Brazos River Electric Transmission recorded in Vol. 367 at Pg. 230, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. d. Thirty-foot building set back line across front of lots per recorded plat and 10% minimum building side set back line and 10-foot utility easement across front and seven and one-half foot utility easement across side and rear lot lines per restrictions recorded in Vol. 713, at Pg. 3, Deed Records of Ellis Count, Texas. e. Power poles and lines in place as shown on survey prepared by Jack Wilder, RPS #4285, dated June 22, 1990. f. The Company (Title Company) specifically excepts to underground utilities now shown and specifically excepted to on survey prepared by John F. Wilder, RPS No #4285, dated June 22, 1990. 134. Parcel No. 142 a. Easements to Buena Vista Bethel water Supply Corporation recorded in Vol. 580 at Pg. 680 and in Vol. 728 at Pg. 428, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. b. Easement to Hill county Electric Coop. recorded in Vol. 733 at Pg. 666, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. c. Easement to Brazos River Electric Transmission recorded in Vol. 367 at Pg. 230, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. d. Thirty-foot building set back line across front of lots per recorded plat and 10% minimum building side set back line and 10-foot utility easement across front and seven and one-half foot utility easement across side and rear lot lines per restrictions recorded in Vol. 713, at Pg. 3, Deed Records of Ellis County, Texas. e. Power poles and lines in place as shown on survey prepared by Jack Wilder, RPS #4285, dated June 22, 1990. f. The Company (Title Company) specifically excepts to underground utilities not shown and specifically excepted to on survey prepared by John F. Wilder, RPS No. #4285, dated June 22, 1990. 135. Parcel No. 257 a. Easements to Buena Vista Bethel Water Supply Corporation recorded in Vol. 757 at Pg. 507, and in Vol. 600 at Pg. 953, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. b. The Company (Title Company) specifically excepts to underground utilities not shown and specifically excepted to on survey prepared by Espey, Huston & Associates, Inc., dated May 21, 1990. c. Power poles and lines in place per above noted survey. d. Telephone risers in place per above noted survey. 136. Parcel No. 264ABC a. Easement to Buena Vista Bethel Water Supply Corporation recorded in Vol. 600 at Pg. 953, Deed Records, Illis County, Texas. b. Easement to Hill County Electric Coop. recorded in Vol. 680 at Pg. 576, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. c. The Company (Title Company) specifically excepts to underground utilities not shown and specifically excepted to on survey dated June 14, 1990, prepared by Espey, Huston & Associates, Inc., John F. Wilder, RPS No. #4825. d. Oil and Gas Leases recorded in Vol. 448, at Pg. 210 Deed Records of Ellis County, Texas. (Note: This was described in Title Policy as a Mineral Reservation.) e. Right of Way Deed from J. Coleman Smith to the State of Texas, recorded in Vol. 411, at Pg. 541, Deed Records of Ellis County, Texas. f. Mineral Reservations set out in instruments recorded in Vol. 531, at Pg. 341, in Vol. 720, at Pg. 692; and in Vol. 661, at Pg. 577, all in the Deed Records of Ellis County, Texas. g. Power poles and lines in place as shown on the survey prepared by Espey, Huston & Associates, Inc., dated June 14, 1990. 137. Parcel No. 462 a. The Company (Title Company) specifically excepts to underground utilities not shown and specifically excepted to on survey dated November 5, 1990, prepared by Survcon, Inc. b. Evidence of an Exxon Pipeline across property with a proximate location as set out on above noted survey. c. That portion of road lying within the bounds of the County road. 138. Parcel No. 271CD a. Easement to Buena Vista Bethel Water Supply Corporation recorded in Vol. 722 at Pg. 977, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. b. Easement to Brazos River Electric Power Company, recorded in Vol. 367 at Pg. 230, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. c. Right of Way Deed to the State of Texas, recorded in Vol. 411 at Pg. 537, deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. d. Mineral Reservation in deed recorded in Vol. 755, at Pg. 996, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. e. Any portion of the subject property lying within the bounds of a public roadway. f. Visible or apparent easements and all underground easement, the existence of which may arise by virtue of an unrecorded grant or use. 139. Parcel No. 600ABCDEF a. Easement to Humble Pipe Line Company recorded in Vol. 378, at Pg. 423, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. b. Easement to Brazos River Electronic Transmission recorded in Vol. 367 at Pg. 230, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. c. Easement to Hill County Electric Coop. recorded in Vol. 733 at Pg. 666, Deed records, Ellis County, Texas. d. Easements to Buena Vista Bethel water Supply Corporation recorded in Vol. 580 at Pg. 680 and in Vol. 728 at Pg. 428, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. e. Thirty-foot building set back line across fronts of lots per recorded plat as approved by the Ellis County Commissioners Court and recorded in Cabinet “B”, Slide 143 of the Plat Records of Ellis County, Texas, and survey prepared by Espy, Huston & Associates, Inc., dated May 21, 1990. f. Pipeline markers designating transverse pipeline across northwesterly portion of subject property per above noted survey. g. Ten-foot utility easement across front lot lines, seven and one-half foot utility easements along side of rear lot lines, and 10% minimum building set back lines along all side lot lines per recorded plat, restrictions and above noted survey. h. The Company (Title Company) specifically excepts to underground utilities not shown and specifically excepted to on above noted survey. i. Telephone risers as shown on above noted survey. 140. Parcels No. 600GH a. Easements to Buena Vista Bethel Water Supply Corporation recorded in Vol. 580 at Pg. 680, and in Vol. 728 at Pg. 428, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. b. Easement to Hill County Electric Coop. recorded in Vol. 733 at Pg. 66. Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. c. Easement to Brazo River Electric Transmission recorded in Vol. 367 at Pg. 230, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. d. Thirty-foot buildings set back line across front of lots per recorded plat, 10% minimum building side set back line, and 10-foot utility easement across front and seven and one-half foot utility easement across side and rear lot lines per restrictions. e. The Company (Title Company) specifically excepts to underground utilities not shown and specifically excepted to one survey prepared by Espey, Huston & Associates, Inc., John F. Wilder, RPS No. 4285, dated June 26, 1990. 141. Parcels No. 600IJ a. Easement to Humble Pipe Line Company recorded in Vol. 378, at Pg. 423, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. b. Easement to Brazos River Electric Transmission recorded in Vol. 367 at Pg. 230, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. c. Easement to Hill County Electric Coop. recorded in Vol. 733 at Pg. 666, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. d. Easements to Buena Vista Bethel Water Supply Corporation recorded in Vol. 580 at Pg. 680, and in Vol. 728 at Pg. 428, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. e. Thirty-foot building set back line across fronts of lots per recorded plat as approved by the Ellis County Commissioners Court and recorded in Cabinet “B”, Slide 143 of the Plat Records of Ellis County, Texas, and survey prepared by Espey, Huston & Associates, Inc., dated May 21, 1990. f. Pipeline markers designating transverse pipeline across northwesterly portion of subject property per above noted survey. g. Ten-foot utility easements across front lot lines, seven and one-half foot utility easements along side and rear lot lines, and 10% minimum building set back lines along all side lot lines per recorded plat, restrictions and above noted survey. h. The Company (Title Company) specifically excepts to underground utilities not shown and specifically excepted to on above noted survey. i. Telephone risers as shown on above noted survey. 142. Parcels No. 600KL a. Easement to Humble Pipe Line Company recorded in Vol. 378, at Pg. 423, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. b. Easement to Brazos River Electric Transmission recorded in Vol. 367 at Pg. 230, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. c. Easement to Hill County Electric Coop. recorded in Vol. 733 at Pg. 666, Deed Recordcs, Ellis County, Texas. d. Easements ot Buena Vista Bethel Water Supply Corporation recorded in Vol. 580 at Pg. 680, and in Vol. 728 at Pg. 428, Deed Records, Ellis County, Texas. e. Thirty-foot building set back line across fronts of lots per recorded plat as approved by the Ellis County Commissioners Court and recorded in Cabinet “B”, slide 143 of the Plat Records of Ellis County, Texas, and survey prepared by Espey, Huston & Associates, Inc., dated May 21, 1990. f. Pipeline markers designating transverse pipeline across northwesterly portion of subject property per above noted survey. g. Ten-foot utility easements across front lot lines, seven and one-half foot utility easements along side and rear lot lines, and 10% minimum building set back lines along all side lot lines per recorded plat, restrictions and above noted survey. h. The Company (Title Company) specifically exempts to underground utilities not shown and specifically excepted to on above noted survey. i. Telephone risers as shown on above noted survey. 143. During the so-called Fourth Revolution in Bavaria, the Bayerische Räterepublik (Bavarian Soviet Republic), or Münchner Räterepublik, was established on April 6, 1919. The Communist Party seized power on April 13, and on April 29, a Red Army was formed. A number of leading figures among the social elite were taken hostage and held in the Luitpoldgymnasium (Luitpold Secondary School), not far from the Villa Stuck. On April 30, 10 hostages were shot, and it was widely believed that Franz Von Stuck was among them. One of the surviving hostages was Otto Thomas Erich Lindpainter, the son of Stuck’s wife, Mary. See Barbara Hardtwig, “Kommentar,” in Franz Von Stuck, ed. Jo-Anne Birnie Danzker (Eurasburg, Germany: Edition Minerva, 1997), 223-24. The term “Spartacist” comes from the name of the Spartacist League led by Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebkind and from the Spartacist uprising of January 1919. 144. Berg Schwanegg (Castle Schwaneck) in Pullach, on the outskirts of Munich, was built on land given by King Ludwig I of Bavaria to artist Ludwig von Schwanthaler when he was knighted. The Castle was later purchased by Franz von Stuck’s architect, Jakob Heilmann, a wealthy construction entrepreneur who turned Schwaneck into a family estate. His son, Otto Heilmann, married Stuck’s daughter, Mary, in 1917.